Alipato Project Wins Another Judgment Against a Batterer

The Alipato Project’s Legal Director Tia Katrina Taruc Canlas and Volunteer Attorney Rowena Collins represented P in a civil suit against D for damages arising out of domestic abuse. When D willfully ignored P’s civil complaint, P’s attorneys obtained an entry of default on her behalf.

At the default judgment hearing, offered into evidence her medical records, photographs of injuries, and the testimony of her brave daughter, sister, and friends. P testified that subjected her to years of physical abuse and sexual assault.

On one occasion, shortly after D grabbed P by the ribcage and slammed her down onto their bed, P began to exhibit flu-like symptoms. Her body ached and she had a fever. Hiding her bruises, went to the emergency room because she believed she had the flu. The doctor informed that the fever was from the physical injuries she suffered as a result of D’s reprehensible actions: she had bruises all over her body and a serious rib injury. To this day, although more than a decade has passed since this incident, she continues to suffer from pain in her ribs.

After years of resisting domestic violence, P left her abuser. She was able to do so with the help of her family and friends who gave her the financial and emotional support she needed to escape for good.

The judge awarded $250,000 in compensatory damages for her pain and suffering. Notably, the judge said to P, “I’m sorry this happened to you,” and… “I hope you have a good weekend.”

Alipato Project thanks the following volunteers for helping P with her case:

Rowena Collins volunteered countless hours interviewing P, drafting pleadings and moving papers, compiling evidence, and attending hearings. Attorney Collins led with her heart, prioritized P’s emotional wellbeing, and created a safe space for P to share her entire story.

Talia Alarid courageously waited outside of D’s home for hours to personally serve him P’s summons and complaint. This saved Alipato Project from having to hire a professional process server. (As a nonprofit organization, every dollar saved goes toward helping other resisters of domestic violence.)

Alipato Project Reaches First Settlement: The Landmark Boblitt v. Boblitt Case

Linda Boblitt made case law when she appealed the trial court’s decision to throw out her civil case against her batterer on the basis of issue preclusion. Linda Boblitt’s abuser’s lawyers argued that since incidents of domestic violence were brought up in the parties’ earlier divorce case, Linda Boblitt had no right to sue her ex-husband for his long history of physical and emotional abuse.

The appellate court reversed the trial court’s dismissal, holding that the party raising issue preclusion has the burden of “showing that the parties litigated in the dissolution proceeding all of the allegations of domestic violence on which Linda’s current tort action is based were, in fact, litigated and decided against her in the dissolution proceeding.” Boblitt v. Boblitt. 190 Cal.App.4th 606, 614, (2010).

Five years later, Linda Boblitt hired the Alipato Project to litigate the rest of her civil claim. See the news excerpt below:

“Canlas settled her first case in Sacramento County. Her client, Linda Boblitt agreed to a settlement of $13,500, a figure that Canlas believed was too low. Boblitt was exhausted from the arduous process and learned that the defendant did not have much more than $13,500 to give. Over the span of a few decades, Boblitt’s ex-husband had broken her jaw, knocked out her teeth, and hit her with a car…

After the settlement conference and the agreement, the judge gave Canlas some needed encouragement. “He told me, ‘Keep it up, you’re doing God’s work.'””

> read more in the East Bay Express!

 Screen Shot 2015-05-15 at 5.00.01 PM

Interview with Alipato Project’s Founder on Feministing Five

We wrapped up Sexual Assault Awareness Month with an interview on Feministing, one of our favorite blogs! Click here to read the full article.